Dvara Research BlogDvara Research Blog
Dvara Research Blog
Doorway to Financial Access
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Themes
  • Subscribe
    • Email Subscription
    • Feed
  • Contact Us
Menu back  

Practitioner led solutions to ensure suitability in microcredit

February 19, 2019Leave a commentFeatured, Research Viewed : 2167

By Deepti George, Dvara Research

The objectives of sustainable businesses are well-aligned with ensuring the financial health of households, and this holds true for all types of lending businesses. In the specific context of microfinance businesses of NBFC-MFIs, this translates to the business objective of avoiding over-indebtedness of borrowers because of lending to them. Since the universe of borrowers can be characterised as belonging to low-income and vulnerable or potentially vulnerable backgrounds, lending institutions need to be particularly careful in ensuring this business objective is met as a matter of business process. This is particularly so given that the history of the microfinance sector has been chequered with political risk events that have exacerbated business risk in the absence of due process that exhibited an intent by providers to prevent households from becoming over-indebted because of lending to them. We have in the past, showcased evidence to indicate that households are experiencing over-indebtedness from microcredit and that households are undertaking suboptimal coping mechanisms that adversely affected their financial and non-financial lives. In October 2018, Dvara Research conducted a workshop that aimed at engaging with practitioners (NBFC-MFIs and NGO-MFIs) to share this evidence to answer the question of how to assess the suitability of microcredit for borrower households. The proceedings of this workshop were broadly grouped into process-based and product-based solutions, and a summary of these proceedings was published here.  We studied existing empirical evidence on what constitutes over-indebtedness and in the specific context of Europe, where we found good literature, we covered its definitions, indicators and influencing factors. Armed with this understanding, we further studied past and current efforts by practitioners that were aimed at avoiding the incidence of over-indebtedness among borrower households. We concluded that the core issue of household distress due to over-borrowing needs greater attention.

Drawing on focussed insights we received from the practitioner workshop, and our learnings from internal research, we proposed a set of practitioner-led solutions to operationalise suitability assessments within microfinance at a Technical Session titled “Operationalising Suitability in Microcredit – Preventing Over-indebtedness among Borrower households”, at the Inclusive Finance India Summit 2018.  The full video of the presentations and the panel discussion can be viewed here. In this post, we discuss briefly, an overview of these practitioner-led solutions, also documented in the form of a Note that we are publishing. The suggestions we make are in the form of business processes that financial institutions can incorporate into their operations to reduce and prevent instances where loan disbursements push borrower households into over-indebtedness. In the note, we outline four steps to do so, which are briefly highlighted below.

Step 1: Defining Suitability in Microcredit

For microcredit, “a loan is unsuitable for a borrower if, based on an assessment of her financial situation at the point of sale, she is likely to face substantial hardship in servicing that loan through the tenure.” In other words, at Point-Of-Sale, the lender must conduct due diligence to ascertain the ability of the retail customer

  • To meet his/her repayment obligations when they are expected to fall due (this is for both unique repayment obligations as well as the total repayment obligation under the credit arrangement),
  • To meet these repayment obligations out of own income and savings without having to realise security or assets.

Therefore, microcredit lenders must have a point-of-sale assessment process that must reasonably ensure that because of the specific loan, customers will not find themselves in a situation where:

  • they have to prioritise repayments over essential expenditures; or
  • they end up in non-transient credit-dependent behaviour to make repayments.

Step 2: Assessing Suitability at a Household level

Suitability is to be assessed not for the loan applicant in isolation but for the applicant’s household. A household level approach to assessing indebtedness is not new to microcredit or for retail lending businesses. It is well known that cash flows are managed at the level of a household rather than at the level of the individual borrower, and any credit availed by a member of the household is in most cases, added to the overall cash flows of the household, while repayments most commonly come from pooled cash flows of the household.  This, therefore, requires an understanding of the ability to make repayments at the level of the household and building a picture of the household’s formal and informal debt and its repayment capacity – in the note we propose some suggestions on how this can be carried out in a meaningful manner without having to put in place an overly cumbersome process. 

Step 3: Determining a workflow for decisioning

The decision to lend based on the Debt-To-Debt Service Capacity Ratio (DSR) Indicator for the household is to be arrived at using a decisioning logic, first put out by Prathap and Khaitan (2016), and detailed out further in the note.

The decisioning logic requires the calculation of the surplus cashflows of the household and the existing and new DSR of the household, at current and proposed/new levels of debt (if the requested loan was to be availed by the household) and the setting of cut-offs beyond which the household will not be lent to, or lent to only if additional protections are put into place.

Step 4: Setting System-level Capabilities based on Organisational Capacity

The overall workflow that we propose will have the following unique characteristics.

  • At the Loan Application Stage: Occupation profiles of the family and income, expense and debt cash flows of the household are captured. This is done either by directly asking the applicant or through suitable proxies, or a combination of both.
  • At the Credit Bureau Check Stage: A credit bureau check for not just the loan applicant in question, but also for all other adult members of the household. Such a credit check is to be carried out using “combo reports” to get a complete picture of the total formal debt of each adult member of the household. 
  • At the Loan Approval Stage: An algorithm that uses as inputs, the information obtained in the previous two stages to calculate the current (with an existing debt of the household) and new (debt of the household including the new loan) levels of debt servicing capacity of the household and to make a decision on whether to approve the loan in question.

We understand that NBFC-MFIs exist at various scales, have different geography-based and cultural realities and field staff capabilities, and it may not be possible for all of them to operationalise one single uniform suitability assessment process. For this purpose, we propose three levels of sophistication of the suitability assessment process to choose from, to build organisational capacity, provided the following important underlying requirements are put into place:

  • Capacity to capture demographic details of all household members. This includes:
    • Names, age, the gender of all members of the household, and
    • Nature of occupations for each earning member.
  • Technology to enable automated decisioning algorithm outlined in Step 3.
  • Building basic data analytics capabilities internally and strengthening it depending on the level of sophistication sought.
  • Capacity to obtain and utilise credit reports for all members of the household.

Once these are in place, the figure below provides a quick overview of the organisational capacity proposed for each of the three levels:

Three Levels of Organisational Capacity

The note concludes by discussing some of the common concerns in operationalising these suggestions, namely costs in relation to technology, human resources, and the incremental costs of accessing combo reports for all adult members of the household.

Click here to read the note. We welcome your comments and suggestions to further improve upon these proposed solutions.  

Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
microcreditmicrofinanceSuitability
Leave Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

20 − 18 =

clear formSubmit

Related posts
Health Insurance Ownership in India
August 5, 2022
Managed Competition in the National Health Insurance System of Israel
July 25, 2022
NSSO’s latest Debt and Investment survey points to significant disparities in net worth among Indian households
July 20, 2022
Report: The costs of using Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) products
July 7, 2022
Towards designing UPI services for constrained users
July 6, 2022
Payment Failures in Direct Benefit Transfers
July 4, 2022
Search
Recent Comments
  • Prasanna Srinivasan on Care through competition: The case of the Netherlands: “This made interesting and informative reading. Thank you. Inevitably, the mind ran a comparison with the Indian context even while…”
  • Misha Sharma on Direct Benefit Transfers in Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Andhra Pradesh: Introducing the Dvara-Haqdarshak Study on Exclusion in Government to Person Payments: “Great post, Aarushi. It will also be interesting to document the challenges faced in accessing these transfers and experiences with…”
  • Misha Sharma on What is Social Protection?: “Thanks for writing this, Anupama. A much needed piece and looking forward to the second post in this series. It…”
Subscribe and Follow Us

Popular Post

Popular Post
  • Health Insurance Ownership in India
    August 5, 2022
  • Managed Competition in the National Health Insurance System of Israel
    July 25, 2022
  • NSSO’s latest Debt and Investment survey points to significant disparities in net worth among Indian households
    July 20, 2022

Categories

Categories
  • Channels(88)
  • Consumer Protection(33)
  • Events(30)
  • Featured(42)
  • Field Reports(6)
  • From the field(9)
  • General(22)
  • Guest(30)
  • Household Research(75)
  • Long Term Debt Markets(9)
  • News(45)
  • Origination(30)
  • Products(42)
  • Regulation(112)
  • Research(259)
  • Risk Aggregation(26)
  • Risk transmission(63)
  • Small Cities(21)
  • Technology(25)
  • Uncategorized(106)
  • Unemployment Support(5)

Archives

Archives
  • August 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (5)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (4)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (6)
  • October 2021 (4)
  • September 2021 (4)
  • August 2021 (6)
  • July 2021 (6)
  • June 2021 (10)
  • May 2021 (7)
  • April 2021 (9)
  • March 2021 (9)
  • February 2021 (7)
  • January 2021 (3)
  • December 2020 (7)
  • November 2020 (6)
  • October 2020 (10)
  • September 2020 (9)
  • August 2020 (12)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (5)
  • May 2020 (8)
  • April 2020 (4)
  • March 2020 (8)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (9)
  • December 2019 (4)
  • November 2019 (3)
  • October 2019 (7)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (4)
  • June 2019 (4)
  • May 2019 (4)
  • April 2019 (7)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (5)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (5)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (5)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • December 2017 (5)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (6)
  • December 2016 (5)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (4)
  • June 2016 (8)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (5)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (5)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (3)
  • May 2015 (3)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • September 2014 (4)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (6)
  • January 2014 (8)
  • December 2013 (7)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (7)
  • September 2013 (7)
  • August 2013 (5)
  • July 2013 (6)
  • June 2013 (7)
  • May 2013 (6)
  • April 2013 (8)
  • March 2013 (9)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (9)
  • December 2012 (8)
  • November 2012 (7)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (5)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (7)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (6)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (8)
  • September 2011 (7)
  • August 2011 (3)
  • July 2011 (6)
  • June 2011 (11)
  • May 2011 (8)
  • April 2011 (9)
  • March 2011 (13)
  • February 2011 (10)
  • January 2011 (8)
  • December 2010 (10)
  • November 2010 (10)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (13)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (6)
  • May 2010 (13)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (10)
  • February 2010 (5)
  • January 2010 (4)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (6)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (2)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (1)
Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Site Map

www.dvara.com