Dvara Research BlogDvara Research Blog
Dvara Research Blog
Doorway to Financial Access
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Themes
  • Subscribe
    • Email Subscription
    • Feed
  • Contact Us
Menu back  

Household Over-indebtedness in Europe: Definitions, Indicators and Influencing factors

January 2, 2019Leave a commentHousehold Research Viewed : 5086

By Sansiddha Pani, Dvara Research

As part of our efforts to better understand over-indebtedness among Indian households, we looked at prior research from Europe that could further aid our understanding of the topic. In this post, we share our learnings from the European context

In the late ’90s and early 2000s, Europe saw the expansion of credit availability and the overall increase in household indebtedness[i]. A study by Disney, Bridges and Gathergood (2008) noted that the United Kingdom had seen a 50% increase in household indebtedness relative to income.[ii]  After the recession in 2008, increased household level debt received even more attention, as many studies concluded that countries with higher debt at the household level were hit harder by the recession. This prompted a number of research studies and papers to measure and understand over-indebtedness at the household level in Europe. Most of the research around this subject is based on data from various socio-economic surveys that have been carried out in various European countries, like the British Household Panel Survey, EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions, and the Bank of Italy Household Income and Wealth Survey.

Definitions of Over-indebtedness

There is no commonly accepted definition of over-indebtedness in the literature. In the UK over-indebtedness is defined as a situation “where households or individuals are in arrears on a structural basis, or at a significant risk of getting into arrears in a structural basis”[iii]. In Germany it is defined as a household whose income, “in spite of a reduction of the living standard, is insufficient to discharge all payment obligations over a long period of time”[iv].

In 2008, a study by the European Commission titled “Towards a common operational Definition of Over-indebtedness” identified a number of common features of the various definitions of over-indebtedness used among different member countries. It recognised over-indebtedness as a multi-dimensional phenomenon with the following dimensions:[v]

  • Economic Dimension: All definitions take into account the ability to repay the debt, based on income and the amount of debt.
  • Temporal Dimension: Over-indebtedness must be structural in nature, i.e. it must not be something that is temporary but must persist in the medium term.
  • Social Dimension: Over-indebtedness definitions also take into account that the household must be able to meet basic necessities after the repayment of debt.
  • Psychological Dimension: Some definitions also take into account the stress of being over-indebted.

The study also suggested the following criteria for a common definition of over-indebtedness.

  • “the unit of measurement should be the household because the incomes of individuals are usually pooled within the same household;
  • indicators need to cover all aspects of households’ financial commitments: borrowing for housing purposes, consumer credit, to pay utility bills, to meet rent and mortgage payments and so on;
  • over-indebtedness implies an inability to meet recurrent expenses and therefore should be seen as a structural rather than a temporary state;
  • it is not possible to resolve the problem simply by borrowing more;
  • for a household to meet its commitments, it must reduce its expenses substantially or find ways of increasing its income.”

According to a research note on over-indebtedness prepared for the European Commission, based on the above criteria, an over-indebted household may be defined as “one whose existing and foreseeable resources are insufficient to meet its financial commitments without lowering its living standards”.[vi]

Measuring Over-indebtedness

As may be seen from the above definitions, it is not easy to identify a household which would meet the above definition of over-indebtedness. Studies have used a variety of indicators depending on the kind of data that is available from different surveys that focus on household wealth. Studies have used both subjective (Ex: level of difficulty in repaying debts) and objective indicators (Ex: debt to income ratio). The study by the European Commission outlines various indicators which were used to measure over-indebtedness in Europe, both at a pan-Europe level and in each member country. It catalogues the indicators into the following four groups:

  • Statistics on debt settlements like debt-write offs, or court arranged solutions
  • Data on financial arrears
  • Indicators like the borrowing-income ratio of a household, household debt-service burden
  • Subjective assessment of the financial burden by the household

Depending on the data and information available, different countries use different indicators to measure over-indebtedness. D’Alessio and Iezzi (2013), as part of their paper based on data from the Bank of Italy Household Wealth and Income survey, have compiled some common indicators of over-indebtedness which are shown below:[vii]

Source: D’Alessio and Iezzi (2013)

The separation of home loans from other consumer credits considers the number of assets that a household may have which can be used to pay off the debt in case of difficulty. The paper by D’Alessio and Iezzi (2013) also tried to consider any financial or real assets that a household may possess by looking at debt to income ratio in three different ways:

  1. Simple Debt to Income ratio
  2. Reducing debt servicing cost based on liquidating financial assets, while also reducing disposable income to account for a loss of income from financial assets
  3. Reducing debt servicing cost based on liquidating financial and real assets of the household, and accordingly reducing disposable income

Many subjective indicators are also used to measure over-indebtedness. Despite the many issues associated with subjective indicators (which are self-assessed and self-reported), such criteria take into account the psychological dimension of over-indebtedness as well as expectations about future incomes. The exact indicator used in different studies depends on the kind of questions that were asked as part of the survey on which the study is based. Some such criteria are given below:

  • Households reporting that repaying loans is a major burden on them
  • Households reporting that they make ends meet with difficulty

The paper by D’Alessio and Iezzi (2013) considers such subjective criteria as the gold standard of measuring over-indebtedness and uses them to compare the effectiveness of other objective criteria. They also compare various indicators using the same underlying dataset and find that very often there is not only quite a lot of variation in the households which are considered as over-indebted based on different indicators, but there is also often limited overlap between these two indicators. For example, based on the Italian Survey on Income and Wealth, 3.17% of households spend more than 30% of income on debt repayments and are thus over-indebted. But of this only 0.35 % of households are actually in arrears on their repayments for more than three months. Thus, while one set of households is being considered over-indebted by one indicator, an almost entirely different set is being identified by a second indicator.

Similarly, the overlap of various objective indicators and subjective indicators also varies quite a bit. For example, among households spending more than 30% on debt repayments, only about half reported that they face difficulty in making ends meet.

D’Alessio and Iezzi (2013) also argue that different indicators may be better at measuring over-indebtedness among different types of households. The performance of indicators also depends on the cut-off points chosen for each of the indicators. They also argue that the limited overlap across different indicators suggest that different indicators measure different dimensions of over-indebtedness.

A paper by Keese (2010), which compares objective and subjective measures of over-indebtedness, takes into account two types of objective indicators, i.e. total debt to household income ratio and ratio of household income after debt-repayment to subsistence income level. For both these indicators, the paper looks at the debt of two different types, i.e. consumer credit only and consumer credit combined with home loans. The paper argues that housing debt is associated with accumulating long-term wealth and home ownership significantly reduces the pressures on household budgets compared to households which are tenants. The paper also looks at the ratio of household income with minimum subsistence level income as a measure of possible over-indebtedness. This indicator considers the social dimension of over-indebtedness. It must be noted that most countries in Europe have policies for minimum income levels which are guaranteed by the state.[viii]

Factors that influence Over-indebtedness

Many studies on over-indebtedness also explore the various factors that influence it. These studies are also based on national or international household wealth and income surveys. Anderloni and Vandone (2008) in their review of the literature on household over-indebtedness outline the following common variables which many studies explore for their link to household over-indebtedness:

  • Family composition and age
  • Family circumstances
  • Economic activity status and level of education
  • Income and labour conditions

Other common variables they outline are housing tenure, real estate wealth, savings, the area of residence, health and ethnicity.

The European Commission study outlines many factors that affect the risk of household level over-indebtedness, some of which are outlined below:

  • Family type and number of children
  • Income levels
  • Employment status
  • Housing tenure
  • Savings and spending patterns
  • Unsecured credit commitments

Along similar lines, D’Alessio and Iezzi (2013) explore whether certain measures of over-indebtedness are more suitable for certain particular classes of households based on age, education, and income levels. For example, they find that when using the indicator of debt payments to income ratio, among households where the head of the household is 31-40 years old, 6.5% are over-indebted and of this 2.8 % also subjectively considered themselves over-indebted. But when the head of the household is 51-60 years, 2.9% are over-indebted based on the same objective indicator and 1.6% of these households are over-indebted based on the subjective indicator. The overlap between the subjective and objective indicators is higher among households where the head is between 51-60 years old.

The European Commission study reports that many researchers have linked income with a likelihood of over-indebtedness and concluded that households with lower income are more likely to be over-indebted. But many other pieces of research have also cautioned that a number of other factors also act in combination with income levels. For example, Kempson and Atikinson (2006) find households with above-median incomes but with high credit commitments are also very likely to be over-indebted.[ix]

Several studies also report that households living in rented accommodation also have a higher likelihood of being over-indebted. Studies have also shown that the odds of households with children being over-indebted are higher than those without children, relying on a study by Niviere (2006) which explains that this occurs because a higher proportion of expenditure cannot be reduced, and child rearing can lead to lowering of working hours of one parent.

While such studies have been undertaken to link over-indebtedness with a number of factors in European countries, it remains to be seen whether these relationships hold true among Indian households. An understanding of these factors can help not only to identify reasons for over-indebtedness but can also serve as a tool to recognise whether a particular household is likely to become over-indebted or not.

—

[i] European Commission, 2008, Towards a Common Operational European Definition of Over-indebtedness, (http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=762&langId=en)

[ii] Bridges R. et. al., 2008, Drivers of Over-indebtedness, (https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090609023023/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file49248.pdf)

[iii] OXERA, 2004, Are UK Households Over-indebted? (https://www.oxera.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Are-UK-households-overindebted.pdf)

[iv] Haas, Oliver J., 2006, Over-indebtedness in Germany, (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.745&rep=rep1&type=pdf)

[v] European Commission, 2008, Towards a Common Operational European Definition of Over-indebtedness, (http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=762&langId=en)

[vi] European Commission, 2010, Research Note 4/2010: Over-indebtedness. (http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6708&langId=en)

[vii] D’Alessio, Giovanni and Iezzi , Stefano, 2013, Household Over-indebtedness: Definition and measurement with Italian Data, (https://www.bis.org/ifc/events/6ifcconf/dalessioiezzi.pdf)

[viii] Directorate General for Internal Policies (European Parliament), 2017, Minimum Income Policies in EU Member States (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/595365/IPOL_STU%282017%29595365_EN.pdf)

[ix] Kempson, E. and Atkinson, A., 2006, Overstretched: People at risk of financial difficulties, (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.540.5155&rep=rep1&type=pdf)

Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Household Financeover-indebtedness
Leave Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

4 × 3 =

clear formSubmit

Related posts
Blog Competition on Suitable Finance for Agricultural Households
October 4, 2019
Bridging Gaps in Household Finance Through Research Evidence and Data
July 15, 2019
The Dvara Open Online Repository for Household Finance
March 30, 2019
A 100 Papers, 200 + Points of Evidence, 1 Financial Well-being Evidence Gap Map
March 18, 2019
Process innovations in Microfinance aimed at avoiding over-indebtedness
January 8, 2019
Flexibility in Microfinance Loan Contracts
December 26, 2018
Search
Recent Comments
  • Prasanna Srinivasan on Care through competition: The case of the Netherlands: “This made interesting and informative reading. Thank you. Inevitably, the mind ran a comparison with the Indian context even while…”
  • Misha Sharma on Direct Benefit Transfers in Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Andhra Pradesh: Introducing the Dvara-Haqdarshak Study on Exclusion in Government to Person Payments: “Great post, Aarushi. It will also be interesting to document the challenges faced in accessing these transfers and experiences with…”
  • Misha Sharma on What is Social Protection?: “Thanks for writing this, Anupama. A much needed piece and looking forward to the second post in this series. It…”
Subscribe and Follow Us

Popular Post

Popular Post
  • Health Insurance Ownership in India
    August 5, 2022
  • Managed Competition in the National Health Insurance System of Israel
    July 25, 2022
  • NSSO’s latest Debt and Investment survey points to significant disparities in net worth among Indian households
    July 20, 2022

Categories

Categories
  • Channels(88)
  • Consumer Protection(33)
  • Events(30)
  • Featured(42)
  • Field Reports(6)
  • From the field(9)
  • General(22)
  • Guest(30)
  • Household Research(75)
  • Long Term Debt Markets(9)
  • News(45)
  • Origination(30)
  • Products(42)
  • Regulation(112)
  • Research(259)
  • Risk Aggregation(26)
  • Risk transmission(63)
  • Small Cities(21)
  • Technology(25)
  • Uncategorized(106)
  • Unemployment Support(5)

Archives

Archives
  • August 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (5)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (4)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (6)
  • October 2021 (4)
  • September 2021 (4)
  • August 2021 (6)
  • July 2021 (6)
  • June 2021 (10)
  • May 2021 (7)
  • April 2021 (9)
  • March 2021 (9)
  • February 2021 (7)
  • January 2021 (3)
  • December 2020 (7)
  • November 2020 (6)
  • October 2020 (10)
  • September 2020 (9)
  • August 2020 (12)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (5)
  • May 2020 (8)
  • April 2020 (4)
  • March 2020 (8)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (9)
  • December 2019 (4)
  • November 2019 (3)
  • October 2019 (7)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (4)
  • June 2019 (4)
  • May 2019 (4)
  • April 2019 (7)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (5)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (5)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (5)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • December 2017 (5)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (6)
  • December 2016 (5)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (4)
  • June 2016 (8)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (5)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (5)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (3)
  • May 2015 (3)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • September 2014 (4)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (6)
  • January 2014 (8)
  • December 2013 (7)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (7)
  • September 2013 (7)
  • August 2013 (5)
  • July 2013 (6)
  • June 2013 (7)
  • May 2013 (6)
  • April 2013 (8)
  • March 2013 (9)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (9)
  • December 2012 (8)
  • November 2012 (7)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (5)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (7)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (6)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (8)
  • September 2011 (7)
  • August 2011 (3)
  • July 2011 (6)
  • June 2011 (11)
  • May 2011 (8)
  • April 2011 (9)
  • March 2011 (13)
  • February 2011 (10)
  • January 2011 (8)
  • December 2010 (10)
  • November 2010 (10)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (13)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (6)
  • May 2010 (13)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (10)
  • February 2010 (5)
  • January 2010 (4)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (6)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (2)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (1)
Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Site Map

www.dvara.com