Dvara Research BlogDvara Research Blog
Dvara Research Blog
Doorway to Financial Access
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Themes
  • Subscribe
    • Email Subscription
    • Feed
  • Contact Us
Menu back  

Introduction to Housing Finance: The Affordable Housing Finance Company (AHFC) Lending Model – Part 2

December 13, 20131 CommentOrigination Viewed : 6598

By Amit Bajpai, Sreya Ray and Bama Balakrishnan, IFMR Capital

This post is a continuation of our earlier post where we had introduced the environment for AHFCs and HFCs in India.

Lending Models of AHFCs

The target clients of AHFCs are mostly people with relatively low funding requirements who either do not have adequate credit history and/or will not be funded by larger HFCs or banks – due to low-ticket size loan requirements, due to earning income from occupations that may be perceived as risky, or due to having non-traditional earning sources that come from self-employment or employment in the unorganized economy with no formal financial documentation. Some segments of the target borrower market may indeed have banking habits and may have borrowings from formal institutions for other needs such as vehicle financing, credit cards, SME loans etc.

The lending model is fairly uniform across various AHFCs, with some variation in naming or sequence. The key features of the lending model are summarized as follows:

  1. In-house Origination & Collections – Many AHFCs are highly focussed on high quality clients and (with the exception of a few) prefer to have in-house origination. Likewise, the delinquency management process is kept in-house to maintain control, build accountability and implement fair collection practices.
  2. Separation of Business from credit – AHFCs emphasise the independence of credit from sales and align their incentive structures with high quality origination to achieve maintenance of asset quality and adherence of fair practices.
  3. Rigorous screening of client information – In the absence of traditionally-accounted cash flows (i.e. in formats such as financial statements, IT returns, payslips etc.), AHFCs rely on triangulation & validation of information through exhaustive personal discussion and verification processes (checking trade records, reference checks, physical visits).
  4. Emphasis on Cash Flow Analysis – AHFCs base their credit analysis and decision on cash flow analysis, using inputs obtained from clients as explained above. The credit team may also use proxy indicators to evaluate the standard of living.
  5. Legal, Technical and Internal Audit Functions – Some AHFCs have outsourced these critical functions to pre-approved/empanelled service providers to minimise fixed costs, while others have invested in building these functions in-house as they grow in scale. AHFCs have developed a good working knowledge of property evaluation and security creation given various laws and regulations governing the same. This is incorporated in the origination process through their lending policy. Property eligibility criteria are well defined and closely monitored.

There may be a divergence in process to the above for some AHFC players, as laid out below:

  1. Some AHFCs choose to rely on outsourced origination i.e. using agents, or by partnering with NGOs and MFIs.
  2. Some AHFCs prefer to work with salaried customers, where credit analysis is simpler and more standardised; while others may focus on the self-employed business class, who may be more under-served, owing to their inability to access bank funds (due to lack of traditionally-accounted income) and their need for faster, simpler processing and disbursement.
  3. AHFCs who focus on self-employed customers in the informal sector where fluctuation of income levels is higher, face higher credit and also have stronger processes on credit analysis, data validation and data verification. The information sourced from clients is checked at various levels by sales, independent agencies, Fraud Control Units and Credit, during its movement from application to sanction.

What are the stylized features of the AHFC lending model?

As more and more players enter the housing finance space and existing players scale up, the onus is on optimizing the lending model and capturing higher market share while protecting asset quality. Some processes that are characteristic of AHFCs are:

  • Existence of Fraud Control Units (FCUs) to check genuineness of KYCs.
  • Some HFCs have taken all household earning members as co-applicants to minimise likelihood of loan default.
  • Document Management System – A few HFCs have document truncation system which lets them scan all client documents on their software, thereby reducing their dependence of physical documents.
  • High Quality MIS – Some HFCs have inbuilt data validation checks and process controls which leaves little scope for process flow hiccups and data quality issues.
  • Double CB for low-income1 customers – As low-income/economically-weaker clients may be borrowers both from banks and MFIs, some HFCs perform Credit Bureau checks both for microfinance institutions and bank lending to these clients.

Road Ahead and Support Required

As has been explained above, AHFCs have designed innovative business models with a lot of attention to origination and credit quality, and who are focused on a customer segment inadequately served by the mainstream financial system. Even as AHFCs seek to scale up operations, capture and consolidate market share and diversify their geographic footprint, they require efficient sources of long term debt financing.

The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) Act was enacted in 2002 for regulation of securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest by secured creditors. The SARFAESI Act empowers Banks/Financial Institutions to recover their non-performing assets without the intervention of the Court. The SARFAESI Act defines financial institutions (FI) for whom the provisions of the Act are available. In order for an NBFC to qualify as an FI it would have to be a public financial institution as defined under S.4A of the Companies Act or be notified as an FI by the Central Govt. HFCs have from time to time been notified by the Ministry of Finance as FIs for the purpose of SARFAESI. It would be important for AHFCs to be notified as FIs under SARFAESI, as they become eligible for the same.

This apart, National Housing Bank(NHB) refinances lines, helpful as they are in addressing AHFC’s liquidity and ALM needs, are one solution. There is a need for other capital market financing solutions including structured finance products for AHFCs to realize their long-term growth plans.

Structured finance has enabled the microfinance institutions and small business lenders to access capital markets for funding requirements. Similar models could be replicated for the AHF companies. Through securitization transactions, the interests of AHF originators can be aligned to the requirements of investors with different risk-return profiles. Entities with deeper understanding of the underlying asset class and sound risk management capabilities can subscribe to high risk subordinate cash flows. This subordination not only acts as additional credit enhancement but also allows for the bespoke tenures for senior cash flows resulting in attractive options for capital market investors with varied investment mandates. Another way of risk participation is through providing performance guarantees to the AHF loan pools. One such step in this direction had been taken by NHB by setting up the India Mortgage Guarantee Corporation (IMGC) in 2012.

—
1 – The clients who have equal chances of being either in Microfinance Credit Bureau or Bank credit bureau

Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
AHFCCapitalHousing Finance
1 Comment
  1. Reply
    March 20, 2014 at 4:24 am
    Rajender Gaur

    Yes, this is workable module in Affordable Housing Finance segments, but real challange is support from govt. institutions (SARFAESI Approval, Re-Finance at lower cost).

Leave Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

1 × five =

clear formSubmit

Related posts
Reflections on ten years of KGFS
June 1, 2018
Structuring a Fund Platform for Financial Inclusion in India
November 23, 2016
The Power of Frustration
September 1, 2016
MBS with an impact: Mortgage backed securitisation for affordable housing finance
August 20, 2014
Infograph: The KGFS Model
July 16, 2014
IFMR Capital forays into Rating Advisory
June 27, 2014
Search
Recent Comments
  • Prasanna Srinivasan on Care through competition: The case of the Netherlands: “This made interesting and informative reading. Thank you. Inevitably, the mind ran a comparison with the Indian context even while…”
  • Misha Sharma on Direct Benefit Transfers in Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Andhra Pradesh: Introducing the Dvara-Haqdarshak Study on Exclusion in Government to Person Payments: “Great post, Aarushi. It will also be interesting to document the challenges faced in accessing these transfers and experiences with…”
  • Misha Sharma on What is Social Protection?: “Thanks for writing this, Anupama. A much needed piece and looking forward to the second post in this series. It…”
Subscribe and Follow Us

Popular Post

Popular Post
  • Health Insurance Ownership in India
    August 5, 2022
  • Managed Competition in the National Health Insurance System of Israel
    July 25, 2022
  • NSSO’s latest Debt and Investment survey points to significant disparities in net worth among Indian households
    July 20, 2022

Categories

Categories
  • Channels(88)
  • Consumer Protection(33)
  • Events(30)
  • Featured(42)
  • Field Reports(6)
  • From the field(9)
  • General(22)
  • Guest(30)
  • Household Research(75)
  • Long Term Debt Markets(9)
  • News(45)
  • Origination(30)
  • Products(42)
  • Regulation(112)
  • Research(259)
  • Risk Aggregation(26)
  • Risk transmission(63)
  • Small Cities(21)
  • Technology(25)
  • Uncategorized(106)
  • Unemployment Support(5)

Archives

Archives
  • August 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (5)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (4)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (6)
  • October 2021 (4)
  • September 2021 (4)
  • August 2021 (6)
  • July 2021 (6)
  • June 2021 (10)
  • May 2021 (7)
  • April 2021 (9)
  • March 2021 (9)
  • February 2021 (7)
  • January 2021 (3)
  • December 2020 (7)
  • November 2020 (6)
  • October 2020 (10)
  • September 2020 (9)
  • August 2020 (12)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (5)
  • May 2020 (8)
  • April 2020 (4)
  • March 2020 (8)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (9)
  • December 2019 (4)
  • November 2019 (3)
  • October 2019 (7)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (4)
  • June 2019 (4)
  • May 2019 (4)
  • April 2019 (7)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (5)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (5)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (5)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • December 2017 (5)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (6)
  • December 2016 (5)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (4)
  • June 2016 (8)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (5)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (5)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (3)
  • May 2015 (3)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • September 2014 (4)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (6)
  • January 2014 (8)
  • December 2013 (7)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (7)
  • September 2013 (7)
  • August 2013 (5)
  • July 2013 (6)
  • June 2013 (7)
  • May 2013 (6)
  • April 2013 (8)
  • March 2013 (9)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (9)
  • December 2012 (8)
  • November 2012 (7)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (5)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (7)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (6)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (8)
  • September 2011 (7)
  • August 2011 (3)
  • July 2011 (6)
  • June 2011 (11)
  • May 2011 (8)
  • April 2011 (9)
  • March 2011 (13)
  • February 2011 (10)
  • January 2011 (8)
  • December 2010 (10)
  • November 2010 (10)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (13)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (6)
  • May 2010 (13)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (10)
  • February 2010 (5)
  • January 2010 (4)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (6)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (2)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (1)
Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Site Map

www.dvara.com