Dvara Research BlogDvara Research Blog
Dvara Research Blog
Doorway to Financial Access
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Themes
  • Subscribe
    • Email Subscription
    • Feed
  • Contact Us
Menu back  

A Review of the SEBI Circular for AMCs and Distributors of Mutual Funds

September 9, 20113 CommentsProducts Viewed : 6236

By Shweta Aggarwal, IFMR Rural Finance

As a welcome step, SEBI released a circular for AMCs requesting them to regulate distributors. This is the first time distributors of mutual funds in India will function in a regulated environment within a structured framework. In this circular, SEBI separates out two functions that can be played by the distributor, as an advisor and as an executor. By separating these functions, SEBI has empowered the customers to select distributors based on either their advisory expertise or their capacity to execute transactions or both. Both services have separate charges that need to be paid by the customer and advisory charges can be rejected by the customer.  Transaction charges paid for execution services to the distributor are indirect charges to the customer as they are paid by AMCs from subscription money.

SEBI further keeps customer interests in mind while levying INR 100 transaction charges for only transactions above INR 10,000. This is to attract small and medium investors and encourage them to invest in mutual funds. SEBI also pays attention to improving the quality of originators as they ask Asset Management Companies (AMCs) to conduct thorough Due Diligence for distributors.

These guidelines seem well aligned with customer interests but if viewed from a distributor’s lens may seem to distort incentives and leave grey areas for AMCs. Some of the guidelines addressed by SEBI in the circular are analysed below:

1. Guidelines regarding transaction charges:

The new pricing structure introduced seems inflexible and charges all customers investing more than INR 10,000 a fee of INR 100. Even though this is less than a 1% fee, it may incentivise distributors to ignore small investors since the distributors will earn only if small investors are investing for the first time in mutual funds. Hence a more dynamic price structure needs to be introduced which keeps both, distributor incentives and customer interests in mind.

We feel that a more flexible pricing structure, like ad valorem fees with a cap of INR 100, may be better suited for the Indian mutual fund industry.

2. Due Diligence process conducted by the AMC

The introduction of due diligence checks before appointing distributors is a positive step. It will help maintain reports on quality checks and maintain updated audit reports. It will also help AMC’s monitor the distributors and ensure that they are abiding by regulations and are keeping customer interests in mind. The only concern that arises here is whether all AMCs have the expertise to carry out such checks. AMCs may have to invest in establishing due-diligence and monitoring processes.

The next steps for SEBI should be to publish a comprehensive check list and a unified format for building reports. Themes covered in the check list should be debated and discussed and must eventually align distributors to cater to customer needs through customer awareness programs, product innovation and capable advisory services.

3. Customer Relationship and Transactions shall be categorized as “Advisory” and as “execution only”

This is a great distinction to put in place since the distributor now has an incentive to build expertise in advisory services and the customer has the right to choose and pay for advisory services best suited to his needs. Each time a customer declines advice from a distributor and accepts only its execution services, a distributor will be encouraged to fine tune its advisory expertise. This will create healthy competition amongst distributors and benefit customers over a period of time.

The SEBI circular is definitely a step forward in encouraging presence of high quality distributors that are well aligned with customer interests. However, over a period of time these guidelines will require refinement and more detail to help deepen retail investor base beyond Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities. Important steps forward would be to introduce nationwide awareness campaigns that are conducted by SEBI, more flexible price structures that enable product innovation and increasing presence of distributors even beyond Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities.

Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
financial inclusionMutual FundsSEBI
3 Comments
  1. Reply
    September 10, 2011 at 6:28 am
    Pras

    While the objective is desirable, the following could be limitations. i) The AMC’s interests are in the investor investing not seeking advice. They will therefore promote distributors who bring that it. ii) people won’t pay for advice if they are investing, and won’t seek paid advice if they aren’t investing.  What may be a step is for the distributor to write down a recommendation with his/her anticipated upside of the investment, that the customer can actually review at the end of the year or investment period.This could be on a no-liability basis from the distributors point of view, ie., if the actual result is different, the distributor doesn’t cough up the loss. eg we suggest you buy x as our anticipated price gain will be y in 1 year. Over a period of time the track record of “good” advisors will be built up, and the bad advice weeded out, which is what the aim of such regulation should be working towards. This last bit could be published by the AMC and will actually benefit retail/small investors as they know whom they should be talking to given their risk apetite. Lousy advisors with spectacular results some of the time, will also have their takers Just a suggestion. 

    • Reply
      September 15, 2011 at 2:37 am
      Shweta Aggarwal

      Dear Pras,Thanks for your comment. You highlight some important concerns, let me try and address some of them: 1. Good advice is a part of building a complete market to attract investors who are unsure of investing. AMC’s in fact should have a strong interest in building great advisers to attract potential investors.2. This splits customers into informed and uninformed or those who are aware of market conditions, products available, and their own risk appetite versus those who are unaware. Consequently, we think that there will be customers who would prefer a combination of advice and monetary return.  For instance, first time entrants may especially prefer the comfort of this advice. Hence, it is important to create a system that provides advice, for the long term benefit of the financial consumer.3. Concerning the last point you made, this is very difficult to implement and monitor at a retail level. In fact most research even in investment banks that provide price recommendations, don’t have such a monitoring system. The level of sophistication aside, there is a possibility that if not monitored, you will start falling into a trap where distributors start hiking up recommendations just to get retail investment.Having said that, AMC’s can ensure, through their due diligence process, that distributors are chosen with care and in the long run adopt strategies that encourage customer retention.This will be possible through good advice coupled with desirable outcomes.Hope this helps.Regards,Shweta

  2. Reply
    June 19, 2013 at 6:40 pm
    Ananymous

    THis simply is SEBI cowing down to distributor lobby and introducing entry load in other names

Leave Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

thirteen − one =

clear formSubmit

Related posts
Natural Catastrophe Insurance – In Conversation with Mr. Ulrich Hess
May 18, 2017
Developing the Natural Catastrophe Risk Insurance Market for Low-Income Households in India
May 10, 2017
Using Customer Information to take a Household Approach to Lending
December 11, 2012
Designing a financial product for paddy farmers
November 18, 2012
Consumer Finance Innovations in India
November 14, 2012
PFRDA Aggregators’ Meet
November 29, 2011
Search
Recent Comments
  • Prasanna Srinivasan on Care through competition: The case of the Netherlands: “This made interesting and informative reading. Thank you. Inevitably, the mind ran a comparison with the Indian context even while…”
  • Misha Sharma on Direct Benefit Transfers in Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Andhra Pradesh: Introducing the Dvara-Haqdarshak Study on Exclusion in Government to Person Payments: “Great post, Aarushi. It will also be interesting to document the challenges faced in accessing these transfers and experiences with…”
  • Misha Sharma on What is Social Protection?: “Thanks for writing this, Anupama. A much needed piece and looking forward to the second post in this series. It…”
Subscribe and Follow Us

Popular Post

Popular Post
  • ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’: What is it, and how does it affect customer protection?
    May 5, 2022
  • Call for Papers: Field Workshop on Household Finance 25th June, 2022
    May 4, 2022
  • Care through competition: The case of the Netherlands
    April 28, 2022

Categories

Categories
  • Channels(88)
  • Consumer Protection(33)
  • Events(30)
  • Featured(42)
  • Field Reports(6)
  • From the field(9)
  • General(22)
  • Guest(30)
  • Household Research(75)
  • Long Term Debt Markets(9)
  • News(45)
  • Origination(30)
  • Products(42)
  • Regulation(112)
  • Research(254)
  • Risk Aggregation(26)
  • Risk transmission(63)
  • Small Cities(21)
  • Technology(25)
  • Uncategorized(105)
  • Unemployment Support(5)

Archives

Archives
  • May 2022 (2)
  • April 2022 (4)
  • March 2022 (2)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • December 2021 (4)
  • November 2021 (6)
  • October 2021 (4)
  • September 2021 (4)
  • August 2021 (6)
  • July 2021 (6)
  • June 2021 (10)
  • May 2021 (7)
  • April 2021 (9)
  • March 2021 (10)
  • February 2021 (8)
  • January 2021 (4)
  • December 2020 (7)
  • November 2020 (7)
  • October 2020 (11)
  • September 2020 (10)
  • August 2020 (12)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (5)
  • May 2020 (8)
  • April 2020 (4)
  • March 2020 (8)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (9)
  • December 2019 (4)
  • November 2019 (3)
  • October 2019 (7)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (4)
  • June 2019 (4)
  • May 2019 (4)
  • April 2019 (7)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (5)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (5)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (5)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • December 2017 (5)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (6)
  • December 2016 (5)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (4)
  • June 2016 (8)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (5)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (5)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (3)
  • May 2015 (3)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • September 2014 (4)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (6)
  • January 2014 (8)
  • December 2013 (7)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (7)
  • September 2013 (7)
  • August 2013 (5)
  • July 2013 (6)
  • June 2013 (7)
  • May 2013 (6)
  • April 2013 (8)
  • March 2013 (9)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (9)
  • December 2012 (8)
  • November 2012 (7)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (5)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (7)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (6)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (8)
  • September 2011 (7)
  • August 2011 (3)
  • July 2011 (6)
  • June 2011 (11)
  • May 2011 (8)
  • April 2011 (9)
  • March 2011 (13)
  • February 2011 (10)
  • January 2011 (8)
  • December 2010 (10)
  • November 2010 (10)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (13)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (6)
  • May 2010 (13)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (10)
  • February 2010 (5)
  • January 2010 (4)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (6)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (2)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (1)
Share Via :Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Site Map

www.dvara.com