Dvara Research BlogDvara Research Blog
Dvara Research Blog
Doorway to Financial Access
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
    • Email Subscription
    • Feed
  • Contact Us
Menu back  

Why is the SARFAESI Act of critical importance to lenders?

November 7, 201114 CommentsRegulation Viewed : 73244

By Darshana Rajendran, IFMR Finance Foundation

An asset becomes non-performing when it ceases to generate income for the bank. In India, a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) is broadly defined as one with interest or principal repayment instalment unpaid for more than 90 days.

There exist defined mechanisms to deal with NPAs of banks and financial institutions today. However prior to 1993, banks had to take recourse to the long legal route against defaulting borrowers, beginning with the filing of claims in the courts. A lot of time was therefore spent in the judicial process before banks could have any chance of recovery on their loans. On average, a civil suit decision took anywhere between 5 to 7 years.

Under the Recovery of Debts to Banks and Financial Institutions Act 1993, Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) were set up for recovery of loans of banks and financial institutions. This led to speedy recovery of loans in about 1 year’s time as against the average time of 5 to 7 years required in civil suits. While initially the DRTs performed well, their progress suffered as they got overburdened with the huge volume of cases referred to them.

To speed up the process of recovery from NPAs, The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) Act was enacted in 2002 for regulation of securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest by secured creditors. The SARFAESI Act empowers Banks / Financial Institutions to recover their non-performing assets without the intervention of the Court. The Act provides three alternative methods for recovery of non-performing assets, namely: –

  • Securitisation
  • Asset Reconstruction
  • Enforcement of Security without intervention of the court

Secured creditors are given the power to take possession of the securities in the event of default and sell such securities for the purpose of recovery of the loan. The Act provides for enforcement of Security interest by a secured creditor without intervention of the court, in cases of default in repayment of instalments and non-compliance with the notice period of 60 days after the declaration of the loan as a non-performing asset.

The Act also provides for setting up of Securitisation Companies/ Reconstruction Companies (SC/RC), which acquire the NPAs from banks and financial institutions by raising funds from Qualified Institutional Buyers (as defined by the Act) by issue of Security Receipts (As defined by the Act) representing undivided interest in such financial assets. The Act enables SC/RCs to take possession of secured assets of the borrowers including right to transfer and realize the secured assets. SC/RCs act as debt aggregators or agents of the banks or financial institutions focused in the resolution of NPAs. The SC/RCs buy the impaired assets from banks and financial institutions, thereby cleaning the balance sheets of the banks and permitting them to focus on their normal banking business.

The promulgation of the SARFAESI Act has been a benchmark reform in the Indian banking sector. The progress under this Act had been significant, as evidenced by the fact that during 2002-03 when the Act came into effect, there was an overall reduction of non-performing loans to 9.4 per cent of gross advances from 14.0 per cent in 1999-20001.

Currently, three legal options are available to banks for resolution of NPAs- the SARFAESI Act, Debt Recovery Tribunals and Lok Adalats. The SARFAESI Act has been the most important means for recovery of NPAs. The amount of NPAs recovered under the SARFAESI Act formed over half of the total amount of NPAs recovered in 2009-10. Banks have referred as many as 78,366 loan default cases by end march 2010 under the SARFAESI Act involving a loan amount of Rs. 14, 249 crores. Against this, banks managed to recover Rs. 4,269 crores representing 30% of the loans2.

Recently the ‘Report of the Working Group on the Issues and Concerns in the NBFC Sector’ laid out recommendations to extend the coverage of SARFAESI to NBFCs as well. This move will benefit NBFCs, ensuring quicker recovery of their non-performing assets. This, in turn, could encourage NBFCs to provide access to a wider range of financial products and serve better the cause of financial inclusion.

Receive blog updates by signing-up here: https://www.dvara.com/blog/join/
—
1 – Reserve Bank of India on Trend and Progress of Banking India 2002-2003
2 – Reserve Bank of India on Trend and Progress of Banking India 2009-2010

Share Via :Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone
IFMR Finance FoundationLegal
14 Comments
  1. Reply
    February 1, 2012 at 6:45 pm
    Nisha Tatkar

    what is the difference between Securitisation & Enforcement of Security without intervention of the court?

  2. Reply
    May 11, 2012 at 9:34 am
    sooraj

    Not all secured creditors are given the benefit of protection under SARFAESI Act. In fact, the blogpost wrongly suggests that the secured creditors did not have such protection. Pledgee always had the right of selling the pawned goods and this right they had been possessing since 1872(passage of Indian Contract Act). There are many species of secured creditors and security and SARFAESI does not cover all of them. So, this blogpost really misses the point.

  3. Reply
    May 13, 2012 at 12:10 pm
    Darshana Rajendran

    The
    SARFAESI Act, for the first time, recognised the concept of comprehensive
    security interest. However it is true that it does not have universal
    application, it only applies to banks and financial institutions. Also, while
    possessory security is covered by the Indian Contracts Act, there were no
    provisions in regard to non-possessory securities until SARFAESI was enacted. 

  4. Reply
    May 18, 2012 at 10:33 pm
    Sooraj Sharma97

    Very evidently, you have not read State bank of India V. S.B.Shah Ali, since you say all this. Only serves to highlight how poorly researched this article is.

  5. Reply
    May 21, 2012 at 6:06 pm
    Darshana Rajendran

    I agree that in the case you mentioned, the court held that
    if a contractual right to repossession is provided, there is no need for court to
    interfere. While this case stated that the hypothecatee can take possession of
    goods without intervention of the court as per the hypothecation agreement,
    there have been other cases where contrary views have been expressed by certain
    courts. For example: In case of Tarun Bhargava Vs. State of Haryana & Anr.,
    it was held that “If the agreement is held to be a loan agreement and rights of
    the creditor are held to be those of a hypothecatee, rights of the parties
    under the agreement would be different. A hypothecatee, cannot take possession
    of the security without intervention of the Court, though he has a right to
    take possession or to sell the hypothecated property through Court or to give
    notice to the hypothecator to enforce the security. Permitting a hypothecatee
    to physically repossess the hypothecated goods against the wishes of the
    hypothecator will enable the hypothecatee to 
    take law in his own hands, deprive the hypothecator of his defence by
    depriving him of the use of goods even when his claim may be that he does not
    owe any money” 

    Hence there were conflicting judgments on the rights of the
    hypothecatee. SARFAESI resolved this conflict by conferring powers of
    enforcement on banks and financial institutions. 

  6. Reply
    May 29, 2012 at 4:37 pm
    Sonia

    What is the current exact procedure by which Banks initiate a recovery from a debtor after the Loan becomes an NPA? Do banks have an obligation to sell their NPAs to SC/ARCs immediately after a default of 90 days on the debtors part? And how much time does the SC/ ARC give the debtor to make good the installments missed?

  7. Reply
    June 22, 2012 at 5:29 pm
    Darshana Rajendran

    Once the
    account of the borrower has been classified as an NPA as per the guidelines issued
    by RBI, the Bank will proceed to make a demand notice under Section13 (2)
    informing the borrower about the outstanding amount in the loan account and
    also the consequences. If the borrower raises any written objections to the
    Bank’s demand notice under section 13 (2), then the Bank should reply to the
    objections. If the Banks rejects the objections raised by the borrower under
    section 13 (3A), then the Bank proceeds to issue a possession notice under section
    13 (4) of the Act informing the borrower that they have taken symbolic
    possession of the property. This is not actual possession of the ‘secured
    asset’ or property of the borrower.  The possession notice issued by the
    Bank under section 13 (4) of the Act provides a right to the borrower to
    approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal and file an Appeal if he feels aggrieved. If
    the DRT dismisses the application, then the borrower is entitled
    to file an appeal to the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.In cases
    where the borrower did not approach the Tribunal and in cases where the
    borrower fails to meet the demand made by the Bank, the Bank will take steps in taking physical possession of the property under section 14 and can
    sell the secured asset in public auction.

  8. Reply
    July 2, 2012 at 10:27 pm
    T.R.Radhakrishnan

    Dear Darshana Rajendran,
    At the out set I introduce myself as an Ex-banker presently handling DRT and SARFAESI cases as facilitator. I have clients from all over India. I do not know whether you have made a thorough  study of SARFAESI ACT. I have written many articles about SARFAESI ACT through which I have brought out how this draconian act has infringed into the human rights, fundamental rights and principles of natural justice. Wherever I have handled the cases, they are still in the trial court of DRT and I am sure if argued properly each case will go to supreme court level. Many of the honest borrowers’ lives have been affected by invoking the SARFAESI ACT by the irresponsible bankers whose many wrong doings have caused loss and damages to these honest borrowers. The bankers do not distinguish between an intentional defaulter and a borrower who became a defaulter because of the circumstances beyond his control and the banks  also were and still are   mute spectators to the problems and predicament faced by such borrowers. Most of the bakers never follow RBI directives to prevent account becoming NPA. If you need I can send some of the articles I wrote on the subject matter. I am sorry to have expressed my points so blatantly. T.R.RadhakrishnanE-mail: trrk1941@gmail:disqus .com.Mobile:(0) 9229248048

    • Reply
      April 7, 2014 at 12:54 pm
      M A uppal

      It is indeed a draconian law which has encouraged corruption in Banks.Such laws
      and arbitrary/sadistic interpretation is not sparing other Directors who have nothing to do with the borrowings nor they are guarantors.

    • Reply
      April 6, 2015 at 1:19 pm
      G Manivachagam

      Thanks for the service being provided by you to the borrowers whose loan accounts have become NPA… Once a notice under SARFAESI Act is issued can the NBFC, for instance the State Financial Institutions, continue to debit such NPA account with normal plus penal interest for ultimate recovery? In Civil Courts, I remember, such accrual of interest once recovery proceedings are initiated.. Even with RBI guidelines the NBFC/Banks are not allowed to debit such interests to such accounts once they become NPAs. NBFC/Banks if they keep a separate account of such accrued interest, they should provide equal amount by creating provision, viz., such interests are not to be treated as income.. Some NBFCs are continued to charge such interest on NPAs without adding them into their income and paying income tax on such income. What is the legal position? Can you clarify by mail to maniadg@yahoo.co.in? G Manivachagam, IRS (C&CE) Rtd Mobile : 09449823664

  9. Reply
    October 1, 2012 at 4:06 pm
    Man Singh Tosaria

    The SARFAESI Act is a Cibil law which deals with helping Banks/FIs to take possession of Financial Assets for the sake of recovering their dues (NPA). Does Sec. 35 of The SARFAESI Act supercede criminal laws too?

  10. Reply
    October 29, 2013 at 4:32 pm
    sv.nagarajan

    Brief……..But gives a clear understanding with simple language thank u

  11. Reply
    November 26, 2013 at 2:19 pm
    Puniya

    can the Property bought from the bank under sarfaesi act be sold by the first owner of the land who happens to be the SC/ST. I purchased a property from bank and after 8 years the same property is being claimed by its first owner who is SC .

  12. Reply
    October 3, 2014 at 4:59 pm
    suman gaindhar

    I feel the Sarfeasi act still has lot of loopholes. There are advocates available in the coridoors of DRTs and DRATs who will ensure the defaulters to sleep for 4 years and nothing will happen. This act needs a review.

Leave Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

clear formSubmit

Related posts
RBI’s Financial Stability Reports – A Commentary on its Purpose and Contents
November 2, 2018
Our response to the draft Personal Data Protection Bill, 2018
October 10, 2018
Directed Credit: How can banks become more efficient at delivery?
March 18, 2018
Reviewing Payments Regulation
March 5, 2018
Our Response to the White Paper on a Data Protection Framework for India
February 7, 2018
The Privacy Judgment and Financial Inclusion in India
December 26, 2017
Search
Recent Comments
  • Inderjeet Singh Dang on Reflections on ten years of KGFS: “I was fortunate to have got the opportunity to get a closer look at the bottom of pyramid. Do remember…”
  • chandrachudan Venkatraman on RBI’s Financial Stability Reports – A Commentary on its Purpose and Contents: “Detailed explanation of the PCA framework, its application, and impact of the intervention - Vert moot point and well articulated.…”
  • Deepti George on Is it time to introduce wholesale banks in India?: “Thanks for your pertinent comment Mr. Prasanna. This is an important question and an important piece of the puzzle that…”
Subscribe and Follow Us

Popular Post

Popular Post
  • Old wine in a new bottle? – An analysis of the Pradhan Mantri Shram-Yogi Maandhan
    February 5, 2019
  • Are we protected enough?
    February 4, 2019
  • The Gendered Reality of Technology in India
    January 10, 2019

Categories

Categories
  • Channels(88)
  • Consumer Protection(33)
  • Events(25)
  • Featured(5)
  • Field Reports(6)
  • From the field(8)
  • General(19)
  • Guest(29)
  • Household Research(71)
  • Long Term Debt Markets(9)
  • News(44)
  • Origination(30)
  • Products(42)
  • Regulation(109)
  • Research(49)
  • Risk Aggregation(26)
  • Risk transmission(63)
  • Small Cities(21)
  • Technology(25)
  • Uncategorized(105)
  • Unemployment Support(5)

Archives

Archives
  • February 2019 (2)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (5)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (5)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (5)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • December 2017 (5)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (3)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (3)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (6)
  • December 2016 (5)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (4)
  • July 2016 (4)
  • June 2016 (8)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (5)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (5)
  • July 2015 (3)
  • June 2015 (3)
  • May 2015 (3)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • September 2014 (4)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (6)
  • January 2014 (8)
  • December 2013 (7)
  • November 2013 (8)
  • October 2013 (7)
  • September 2013 (7)
  • August 2013 (5)
  • July 2013 (6)
  • June 2013 (7)
  • May 2013 (6)
  • April 2013 (8)
  • March 2013 (9)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (9)
  • December 2012 (8)
  • November 2012 (7)
  • October 2012 (5)
  • September 2012 (5)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (7)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (7)
  • February 2012 (6)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (8)
  • September 2011 (7)
  • August 2011 (3)
  • July 2011 (6)
  • June 2011 (11)
  • May 2011 (8)
  • April 2011 (9)
  • March 2011 (13)
  • February 2011 (10)
  • January 2011 (8)
  • December 2010 (10)
  • November 2010 (10)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (13)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (6)
  • May 2010 (13)
  • April 2010 (7)
  • March 2010 (10)
  • February 2010 (5)
  • January 2010 (4)
  • December 2009 (3)
  • November 2009 (1)
  • October 2009 (6)
  • August 2009 (1)
  • July 2009 (2)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (1)
Share Via :Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone
Site Map

www.dvara.com